Skip to content
Plainly Feeds

The Iconic Puzzle Game Wouldn't Triumph at The Game Awards — Another Award Type Might Solve This

Each time a significant awards ceremony approaches, there’s always a demand to include additional classifications to acknowledge unsung work and satisfy the hearts of fans dedicated to specific genres.

A fellow writer previously argued supporting a scary games classification. That would rule. Equally deserving are board games, this being a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance if I try to elbow in front because like all blinkered fanatics, there's a strong justification backing this proposal is the most urgent and important of all. This is the request: There should be a category for puzzle games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Organizing artistic expressions isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. There’s a reason film award organizations don’t do it. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise in the world of gaming, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them a single creative category.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, genre categories are essential.

Present Award Structure

Leading game ceremonies offer these genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these classifications effectively encompass numerous genres, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. No suitable classification appears for their placement. Consider three of outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching in a different title, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. Which classification works between these six categories? Simply put, no category fits.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist of brilliant puzzle games published annually that have no home at major award shows, except when they manage to fit classification types such as Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, or the extremely competitive Indie races.

  • A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated completely during that awards season
  • Another creative title was excluded during that ceremony
  • Well-received sorting experience was overlooked in 2021
  • Limited numbers of puzzle games barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Significance of Puzzle Games

Frequently they represent modest productions, yet the craft in brain-teasers is of massive significance. Well-known matching games count as most engaged experiences in the world maintaining this status for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with famous sandbox experiences competing to become best-selling game of all time; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Puzzle games are foundational to the art of video games, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.

Proposal and Rationale

Logic titles wouldn't face that issue. One could readily select five nominees engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave so many good games out.

To emphasize again, these are games lacking appropriate categories in important events. Puzzle game makers function at the challenging frontier game development, producing among essential manifestations within interactive entertainment. Just like cinema stunt performers, they deserve recognition. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.

Written by

Kenneth Hall

A tech minimalist and lifestyle writer passionate about simplifying digital habits and sustainable living practices.

Plainly Feeds

Type to search articles.